doulton bird

Does India need RO filters?

Do we need RO water filters?

Reverse osmosis or RO water filters have become ubiquitous, from bustling metropolises to remote villages. People rely on them for a supply of pure and healthy drinking water. Advertisements and persuasive sales representatives have played a crucial role in establishing trust in these systems. However, as the saying goes, “all that glitters is not gold,” and the widespread use of RO systems raises critical questions about their efficiency and environmental impact.

Humongous water wastage

RO purifiers undeniably deliver on their promise of providing purified water. But the environmental cost associated with their operation is substantial. On average, these purifiers waste approximately three times the amount of water they purify. In simpler terms, for every liter of purified water, an RO system discards three liters. This leads to a significant loss of this precious resource.

Is RO filtration actually required?

This raises an essential question. Is the excessive use of RO systems justified when most Indians have access to water that already meets the safety standards set by the World Health Organization? Dr. Sambuddha Misra, an Assistant Professor at the Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IISc), has conducted extensive research on this topic. He argues that in many cases, the water doesn’t need to undergo RO treatment.

Dr. Misra’s studies have shown that most water sources contain metal concentrations well below WHO’s recommended levels for safe drinking water. While bacterial contamination may be present, there is no need for RO systems to purify such water. In fact, utilizing RO purifiers for this purpose results in wasting seven liters of water for every ten liters processed. This contributes to increased pollution in groundwater and sewage lines. In 2021-22, Dr. Misra and his team conducted research in Haldia, West Bengal. The research revealed that metal concentrations, including lead, were lower than previously assumed. This challenges the current practice of subjecting all water to RO treatment. The study suggests adopting localized solutions to address specific water quality requirements in different areas.

Stripping of minerals from drinking water

Beyond the water wastage issue, RO systems have another drawback. They remove natural minerals and ions from water, making it overly pure and bland. Dr. Sen points out that the long-term health effects of consuming water devoid of essential minerals remain unknown, as RO technology is relatively new. The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) sets the Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) limit for drinking water at 500 ppm (parts per million). However, it’s important to note that exceeding this limit does not necessarily render water unsafe. The WHO recommends a limit of 300 ppm but does not imply that levels above this threshold are harmful. BIS even permits TDS levels of up to 2000 ppm for drinking when alternative water sources are scarce. This fact is often overlooked by the RO industry.
 

The Environmental impact of RO filters

The environmental impact and questionable necessity of RO systems have not gone unnoticed. In 2019, the National Green Tribunal (NGT) directed the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change to issue notifications prohibiting RO use when TDS levels are less than 500 mg/l. Additionally, the NGT suggested a requirement for the recovery of water to be more than 60%. They also advocated for using RO reject water for various non-drinking purposes.
 
In the region of Haldia, where Dr. Misra’s team conducted water quality assessments, a pilot project was launched. The project aimed to raise awareness among residents about appropriate water purification methods based on their water source. The results showed that, apart from areas with petrochemical industries, the majority of water sources were directly suitable for drinking and needed only basic filtration. So, if not relying on RO systems, what is the best approach for ensuring safe drinking water? The simplest and most cost-effective method is to boil water. In case of bacterial contamination, gravity filters can be used. Here, water wastage is nil and you do not need electricity to run the filter.

In short, RO water purifiers have been marketed as a panacea for clean drinking water. However, their excessive use raises environmental concerns and may not be justified in areas where water quality already meets established safety standards. 

A more localized and context-specific approach to water purification is needed to minimize wastage, preserve essential minerals, and ensure access to clean and sustainable drinking water. Boiling water remains a practical and cost-effective option for many communities to achieve safe drinking water. 

Doulton Water filters are not only efficient in terms of water wastage and power consumption, but also are highly sustainable. Explore wonderful online and offline festive deals from Doulton. 

Speak to a water expert find the best water filter suitable for you

If your water source is borewell/tanker etc with TDS above 500 ppm, we do not recommend Doulton Water Filters.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Which product would you like?*

*If your water source is borewell/tanker etc with TDS above 500 ppm, we do not recommend Doulton Water Filters.

You might also want to read

Shopping cart0
There are no products in the cart!
Continue shopping
0

Choose Better Health for your Family

Book your FREE Consultation!

If your water source is borewell/tanker etc with TDS above 500 ppm, we do not recommend Doulton Water Filters.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Preferred Time
:
This field is hidden when viewing the form

*If your water source is borewell/tanker etc with TDS above 500 ppm, we do not recommend Doulton Water Filters.